
Lighting equipment can quickly become very heavy and cumbersome. Lately I have been assembling a cutdown, lightweight location lighting kit which I can carry by myself on public transport.
I begin this post with a look at the drawbacks of using bulky, mains-powered monoblocs. Fortunately there are several battery-powered alternatives, although many carry a hefty price tag. My lightweight location kit is built upon Canon's flagship Speedlite, the 580EXII. Although it offers great bang-per-buck, there are shortcomings. I investigate these in the latter half, asking the question 'How Good is "Good Enough"'?
The Trouble with Monoblocs
Until now my main lighting kit has revolved around three Bowens Gemini 500 monoblocs. These are good quality, mid-range strobes with a wide variety of light shaping accessories. If I lack a particular reflector or require an additional light, I simply phone up my local Calumet and hire what I need.
Monoblocs though have two big drawbacks: First, they require a mains power supply. Secondly they are big and heavy - each unit incorporates its own mains transformer. On location though, especially when outdoors in the middle of nowhere, a wall socket may be hard to come by. What then? Petrol generator is one option. But does one really want to lug all that equipment over stream and down dale?
Clearly my studio lights were built for indoor use only. Trying to remove them from their intended environment is just asking for trouble. Let's take a step back and rethink this.
Battery Packs
I am wanting something light and compact - something I can carry in my backpack with room to spare. Mains power is out so batteries are in. Nevertheless, I must still be able to use all the light shaping accessories I take for granted with my studio lights.
Profoto, Elinchrom and Broncolor all offer lighting products which combine mobility, quality and control. At the time of writing (early 2011) Profoto has it's Pro-7b, Acute-B2 and Pro-B3 lines; Elinchrom has the Quadra RX and Ranger RX; Broncolor meanwhile offers its Mobil battery pack. What all these lighting solutions have in common is that they are painfully expensive. One can easily spend north of £5000. They are still pretty bulky too.
Quantum produce an excellent range of smaller, battery-powered strobes. Many event photographers use them because they are light, rugged and powerful. The battery packs are small enough to clip on one's belt, and far superior to a jumbled bag of AAs. Price is still substantial though.
Enter the Strobist
Much has changed in the last few years, largely in part due to the digital photography explosion and the rise of the modern internet. Digital has lowered the barrier to entry, encouraging people to experiment and learn. Meanwhile, the internet has allowed individuals sharing similar interests to connect and exchange information like never before.
Relatively inexpensive flash units like my Canon Speedlite 580EXII are now enjoying a new lease of life off-camera by means of sophisticated wireless transceivers and a variety of clever gadgets available through eBay. Popular websites such as Strobist feed the trend.
It wasn't always like this of course. Once you needed a workshop, a soldiering iron and a steady hand. Now the demand is there though, manufacturers are mass producing products that only a few years ago were very hard to come by. For £40 on ebay, I can buy a Cheetah Speed Pro bracket that allows me to fit Bowens s-fit accessories onto my Speedlite. LPA Design's latest range of pro-grade Pocketwizards - the MiniTT1 and FlexTT5 - even facilitate true wireless E-TTL2 metering.
As one may no doubt guess by now, the solution I finally arrived at was to invest in another Canon Speedlite 580EXII, bringing my number up to two. I will no doubt add a third later at some point. These will be used in place of my big, bulky Bowens monoblocs where necessary. All my reflectors, softboxes, umbrellas and wireless triggers can be used just as before.
How Good is "Good Enough"?
Let's be clear here: There is a massive difference between a £350 strobe and a £5000 battery-pack kit, as one would expect. What does the extra money buy you? In short: Power, consistency, convenience, build quality, speed, flexibility, support. We will be revisiting these later. This does not mean that the cheaper option is junk; rather, it indicates the degree of compromise made during design and manufacturing. Whether those compromises will impinge too much upon the quality of your work can only be answered by considering the product's shortcomings in relation to what you photograph. How good is "good enough"?
My use-case is quite straightforward: I will primarily be using the Speedlites for photographing people outdoors, in public places, or when transport is a problem (London is not car friendly; often it is easier, quicker and cheaper to just grab a bus or tube train.)
The strengths of these compact, inexpensive, battery powered strobes should be pretty obvious by now. The real question is: How seriously will I be affected by their weaknesses?
I'm afraid I do not have any hard numbers to backup the following points. However, these are the principal criteria by which one piece of flash equipment is distinguished from another. It stands to reason that significantly cheaper products will fare somewhat worse than more expensive models.
Let's have a closer look.
Power
On location, strobes are usually set up in accordance with the environment's natural illumination. It is ultimately the latter which determines exposure.
The most powerful light source of all is the sun. Nothing can beat it. On a sunny day I am most likely to use a Speedlite for fill, if not a bounce board. Only in darker environments is the flash likely to serve as a key light.
Bigger strobes would be useful if I wanted to light a broader area, or maintain a larger distance between subject and source. I am more likely to be photographing individuals though, not groups, so this shouldn't pose much of a problem.
Consistency
Consistency in terms of power output and colour temperature. Obviously one wants the light to be as stable as possible, from one exposure to the next.
When photographing people though one enjoys a little more wriggle room. Especially when one considers the often dramatic effects of subsequent retouching. By contrast, product photography imposes tighter constraints - then again, one would normally do that indoors, using studio lights.
Convenience
Frankly, off-camera Speedlites are a pain to adjust; the buttons on the 580EXII are tiny. Reaching high-up flash units can also prove fiddly. Fortunately there is a wireless solution: The AC3 Zone Controller - another Pocketwizard accessory - can control the power of up to three Speedlite groups remotely.
Changing batteries is another annoyance. Not only does each Speedlite take AAs, they run down pretty quickly at full power. Compatible third-party battery packs, such as the Quantum Turbo 3, boast greater capacity and are much easier to recharge. They do present an additional cost though.
In practice I rarely fire my Speedlite at full power. If I am bothering with flash at all it usually means I am in a dark environment and having to open up the lens. The strobe does not have to work so hard, thus preserving the batteries better.
Build Quality
The Canon 580EXII Speedlite is pretty robust in relation to other strobes in its class. However it is no match for the more expensive flash products. The weakest point is the foot, which normally slides into the camera's hotshoe. To mount the unit on top of a stand, the metal base must be gripped by a special adapter. If one particular part of the flash is most likely to break, it is this.
The Speedlite is not designed for rapid-fire flashing either. Unlike the Quantums say, the Canon bulb is completely enclosed within the plastic body. It simply cannot cool as quickly. A sure fire way of burning out a Speedlite is to connect a Quantum battery pack and fire off a quick succession of flashes...
One must simply take extra care.
Speed
Strobes connected to more substantial batteries will recycle faster. That said, the 580EXII is not too bad providing one has either: A freshly charged set of AA batteries, connected an external battery pack, or reduced the light output.
When the batteries are low, recycling times quickly fall off a cliff edge. The Speedlites give no audible confirmation of a successful flash either; more expensive strobes emit a beep. One must therefore remain vigilant.
Flexibility
Normally my options with not would extend much further than a plastic Sto-Fen diffuser and some gels. With the aforementioned Bowens S-Fit adapter though I can employ all my existing light shaping tools. That is, all my reflectors, soft boxes and umbrellas. Any accessory I obtain for my studio lights can immediately be used with the Speedlites.
Unlike infrared triggering (the original way of controlling Speedlites remotely), wireless radio transceivers allows me to place the Speedlite wherever I want. Out of sight behind trees in broad daylight, for example. With the addition of the Pocketwizard FlexTT5 transceiver, I can also use E-TTL2 metering in situations where it is impractical to manually adjust the power. Live music gigs are one example.
Support
Canon is a globally recognised company and the 580EXII has been heavily tried and tested by thousands of photographers all over the world. I can hire additional Speedlites if necessary and seamlessly slot them into my existing setup. I can also hire additional Bowens light shaping accessories.
Closing Thoughts
As can be expected Speedlites are not a magic bullet. The more expensive battery-pack strobes will step up to a broader range of challenges and working conditions while guaranteeing a higher level of performance. They are a solid investment, providing one has the capital to begin with.
That said, one can still go a long way with the lighter, cheaper Canon 580EXII Speedlites as long as one acknowledges their shortcomings and works around them. A certain cunning is required. In many situations though there will simply be no sensible option other than heavy-duty strobes. It is the responsibility of the photographer to rationally assess each job and maintain an open mind.
Still, if the choice is between getting 85% of the way there or not at all, the answer is often obvious.